You've analyzed them in terms of pulling out stats and general patterns you can move on to your discussion this is the fun bit first-class discussion section should tie the whole thing together it is your most important section because it is where you can argue why your knowledge is so important what it means what patterns and the results might tell you and again how it is going to be online buy thesis online in the future now all of your literature and your sources should have been brought in in the introduction and what all of these marked schemes have been saying is that you shouldn't be bringing new information up in the discussion.

My discussion wasn't too long it was actually shorter than my introduction but all of the sections that I split it into my subtitles were titles made from points thrown in the introduction and bits that I had already said that I was going to explain and talk about in the introduction using my dissertation as an example in the introduction I had said that certain factors will affect the growth of long bones and children they would be genetic affinity geographical and latitudinal affinity write my thesis weaning and early diet and also just general stunting in childhood and adolescence all of these things were brought up during my introduction and they were brought up because a lot of literature was already done on those topics I'm tying them together is how kind of I chose my research interest and that is why my intro is so long but because they had such a long introduction.

It meant that I could create for example separate sections assessing whether or not all of my hypotheses about these different things were correct based on my own results the discussion is not the conclusion the conclusion is a separate section however your conclusions should start to be drawn in terms of responding to your hypotheses and assessing whether or not you have kind of gone the right way about doing things if there was any problems why that might be they aren't a recount of everything you did or an evaluation of your work but they should be critical and evaluative in terms of how you have utilized specific sources why and whether or not previous findings actually work alongside yours [Music] and finally is your conclusion won't be the first to blink now by this point you finish the discussion and you feel like it's all done and over but it's not you still have to tie up all of your findings and analysis into what Liverpool explains should be a well-justified organized and argued conclusion.